Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Chhabilendra Roul, A
PINKESH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tendency to maintain employment stability post-termination. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. inadequate hearing leading to wrongful termination. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding merit and wrongful termination. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. practical implications of fundamental rule 54-a on reinstated employees. (Para 6) |
| 5. final directions for compliance and entitlement. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
Since a common question of facts and law arises in the present O.A.s, they are being disposed of through this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted from O.A. No. 1758/2025 with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The reliefs prayed for in O.A. No. 1758/2025, reads as under:
“a) To quash and set aside the order dated 20.01.2025 bearing F. No. A-34018/15/2024-DE, passed by Director (DE), Department of Posts, Ministry of Communications, Government of India, to the extent of:
i) The clause 3 of the said order dated 20.01.2025 bearing F. No. A-34018/15/2024-DE, passed by Director (DE), Department of Posts, Ministry of Communications, Government of India; and
ii) Not granting the seniority benefits, salary, Arrears, Back Wages, Pay Incr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
