Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
R.Mahadevan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case details and parties listed (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. pay scale parity dispute history (Para 3 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 3. respondents challenge maintainability (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. tribunal upholds jurisdiction (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. judicial precedents on notional pay (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. pay fixation recurring cause (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 7. judgments in rem for parity (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 8. notional pay from 1996 ordered (Para 50 , 51) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
As identical relief is sought in both applications and they arise from similar facts and circumstances, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The relief prayed for in the OA 1006 of 2025 reads as follows:
“To set aside the order in F.No.A023011/44/2024- Ad.II A dated 16.06.2025 of the 2nd respondent in so far it restricts the benefits flowing from the decisions rendered by various courts tabulated therein with regard to the entitlement of Inspectors of Central Excise/Superintendents of Central Excise/Superintendents of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
