Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
Rajasimman – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's reliefs and career facts (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. precedents supporting retrospective pay (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. limitation, delay, and fence-sitters (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. background of anomaly committee decisions (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. no delay; parity for similarly situated (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004 (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
The applicant has filed the OA seeking the following relief:
“A) ….To call for records and proceedings of the case which led to the passing of the orders i.e (i) Office Memorandum in File No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 ie Annexure -A1 and (ii) Office Memorandum in File No.26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt) dated 11.05.2004 i.e Annexure A.2 its subsequent (latest) Office Memorandum in File No. A.26017/65/2003-Ad.II-A(Pt)25.07.2023 i.e Annexure A3, (iii)against the speaking order dated 12.08.2025 (Issued F.No.GCCO/II/24/51/2025-CAO- O/o PrCC-CGST-Zone-Chennai) of the 4th respondent (Annexure A-5) and after going though their propriety, legality and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
