Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, M.L. Srivastava, Administrative Member
P. Vijayan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and pay scale evolution (Para 2) |
| 2. precedents support retrospective pay fixation from 1996 (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. anomaly committee recommendations and judicial affirmations (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. equality mandates benefits for similarly situated employees (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004 (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
The applicant has filed the OA seeking the following relief:
“i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis i.e. from the date when the 5th CPC became operational, based on the judgments/decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals;
ii) To set aside/quash the speaking Order in File No.GCCO/II/24/51/2025 CAO-O/o PrCC-CGST- Zone-Chennai dated 12.08.2025 of the Principal Chief Commissioner of GT & Central Exciose,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
