Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, J, M.L. Srivastava, A
S. Sankaranarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and pay scale issues. (Para 2) |
| 2. precedents support retrospective pay revision from 1996. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claims barred by limitation and laches. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. anomaly committee recommendations for pay parity. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. judgments in rem extend to similarly situated employees. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. notional pay from 1996, actual from 2004. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
The applicant has filed the OA seeking the following relief:
“i) To call for the records of the respondents and to declare that the applicant herein is entitled to the benefits of revised pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 on actual basis i.e. from the date when the 5th CPC became operational, based on the judgments/decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and various High Courts and Tribunals and set aside/quash the speaking Order in File No.III/ (20)/2/25-Accts-O/o-Coom-Cu-Gen-Chennaidated 07.08.2025 ;
ii) To direct the respondents to grant benefits of revised pay and allowances to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
