Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Krishna, Member (A), Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Krishna Vithal Desai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and delayed chargesheet issuance (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents defend against delay; no prejudice to applicant (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's arguments on delay causing prejudice (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. respondents' counterarguments and case law on delay (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. high court directions and factual timeline of delay (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. supreme court precedents on quashing delayed chargesheets (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. prejudice from delay outweighs promotions; chargesheet quashed (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. oa allowed; chargesheet quashed (Para 41) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
The present O.A. has been filed by the applicant seeking following reliefs:
a) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to call for entire record and papers of the case of the Applicant.
b) This Hon'ble Tribunal after verification of entire records and papers of the case & in the light of facts and grounds stated above be pleased to hold and declare that impugned Chargesheet dated 23-9-2017 is false, baseless, incorrect and arbitrary and further be pleased to quash and set
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
