Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, J
A. Mani – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family and marital status impact pension rights. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 8) |
| 2. validation of pension claims under amended rules. (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. judicial precedents support the second wife’s claim. (Para 7 , 9 , 12 , 16) |
ORAL ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
“....... call for all the relevant file of papers/records relating to the issuance of Annexure A-7, A-11, A- 12 & A-13 from the respondents herein & peruse the same; (b) Quash/set aside letter No.SA/P.676/CPGRAMS/E-445385 dated 20.02.2024 (Annexure A-&) issued by Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Salem Division; (c)Quash/set aside the letter No.SA/P.579/Settle/CPGRAM/AM dated 19.03.2024 (Annexure A-11) issued by the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Salem Division; (d) Quash/set aside the letter NO.SA/P.579/Settle/AM dated 24.04.2024(Annexure A-12) issued by the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Salem Division; (e)Quash/set aside the letter No.SA/G.50/PG/2023-2024/CPGRAMS Appeal- 73dated 26.04.2024 (Annexure A-13) issued by the Additional Division
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
