Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
VEENA KOTHAVALE, Judicial Member, SISIR KUMAR RATHO, Administrative Member
G. MARIMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's marital history and bigamy allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. disciplinary proceedings and procedural challenges (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. respondents' evidence of misconduct and suppression (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. applicant's arguments on bias and acquittal (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. respondents' counter on admissions and punishment (Para 31) |
| 6. customary divorce invalid under hindu marriage act (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. custom must be proven; panchayat dissolution ineffective (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 8. applicant's admissions confirm second marriage (Para 42 , 43) |
| 9. service by registered post presumed effective (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 10. disciplinary proceedings independent of criminal acquittal (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 11. oa dismissed; no procedural violations found (Para 51 , 52) |
ORDER
(Hon'ble Ms. Veena Kothavale, Member(J)
This OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal's Act seeking the following relief:-
"to call for the records relating to the proceedings No. B2/5/MO/Digs dated 30.03.2019 issued by the second Respondent which has been
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
