Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. permission granted for joining applications together. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants seek age relaxation for delayed recruitment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. 9-year recruitment gap justifies one-time age relaxation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. age relaxation discretionary, not mandatory right. (Para 7) |
| 5. provisional participation allowed pending representations. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):-
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):-
M.A. No. 1385/2026 in O.A. No. 1061/2026
The present M.A. is filed seeking permission of joining together in a single application.
2. For the reasons stated therein, the M.A. No.1385/2026 is allowed.
M.A. No. 1458/2026 in O.A. No. 1122/2026
The present M.A. is filed seeking permission to join together in a single application.
2. For the reasons stated therein, the M.A. No.1485/2026 is allowed.
O.A. No. 1061/2026 with O.A. No. 1105/2026, O.A. No. 1122/2026
Prayer is made to a limited aspect that the representations are pending before the Competent Authority regarding age relaxation as a one-time measure, and provisionally they may be allowed to participate in the selection process in as the advertisements have been issued after gap of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
