Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of consolidated oas and reliefs sought (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants argue ma english substitutes ba requirement (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents defend strict adherence to recruitment rules (Para 4) |
| 4. court examines qualifications and prior proceedings (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. oas dismissed upholding eligibility criteria (Para 7) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :
Since a common question of facts and law arises in the present O.A.s, they are being disposed of through this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted primarily from O.A. No. 2135/2022 with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The reliefs prayed for in O.A. No. 2135/2022, reads as under:
“(i) Set aside the impugned Order dated 17.12.2021, issued by the Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, whereby the candidature of the applicant for appointment on the post of TGT (English) (Female) (Post Code 132/17) in the Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, was cancelled on the ground that the applicant does not fulfill the eligibility criteria as prescribed in the advertisement;
(ii) Set aside the impugned Vacancy Notice/Advertisement No. 04/2017 dat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
