Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Prakash Chandra Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Human Resource Development – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for compliance with reservation guidelines and roster maintenance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense regarding recruitment adherence to procedures and relative merit. (Para 3) |
| 3. interpretation of pwd reservation guidelines and the impact of administrative errors. (Para 5) |
| 4. conclusion regarding administrative error and dismissal of the application. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :
In the present Original Application, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
“A. Allow and admit the present application.
B. Direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to follow the guidelines / rules of OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO. 36035/02/2017-ESTT (RES), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA dated 15.01.2018 pertaining to the reservation to candidates of PWD category and increase one more vacancy pertaining to the PGT English PWD category by preparing the fresh roaster and set aside the selection process of the PWD candidates done without maintaining the roaster as per the 7.1 of the guidelines / rules of OFFICE MEMORANDUM NO. 36035/02/2017-ESTT (RES), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA dated 15.01.2018 and did not act according to 7.8 of the aforesaid guidelines,
(c) direct the Respondent No. 2 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
