Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Pramodh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police, Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's challenge to adverse apar grading (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents justify apar based on departmental enquiry (Para 3) |
| 3. apar guidelines require transparency and opportunity to improve (Para 5) |
| 4. quash impugned apar for procedural violations (Para 6) |
O R D E R By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):
In the instant OA, the applicant seeks following reliefs:-
i) That this Tribunal summons the records from the respondents. Relating to APAR for the period in question and applicant be allowed inspection of the APAR and other connecting documents.
ii) To quash and set aside the APAR (Annexure-A1) & the appellate order (Annexure-A2) being illegal and issue direction to the respondents to grade the applicant as "Out Standing" based on actual performance in the self-
assessment of APAR.
iii) To declare that (Annexure-A1) APAR and the appellate order in (Annexure-A2) shall not be a bar for considering the applicant for promotion or for entitlement for financial upgradation under MACP and also for any other purpose relating to the service.
iv) To allow the O.A.
v) Award cost of the proceedings and pass such other and further orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstance
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
