Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member, Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member
Tanmoy Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's background and selection grievances (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' defense of selection procedure (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. parties' conflicting positions on ldce criteria (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. rbe 102/2005 mandates 85:15 weightage (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. irem 219(j) supersedes with 50:30 weightage (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. oa dismissed; unchallenged rules apply (Para 12) |
ORDER
Ms. Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:
The applicant has been filed this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief:-
“a) To set aside and quash impugned Letter No. E/E-22/JE (P.Way) /LDCE/2024 dated 27/29.08.2024 issued by the Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway, Asansol as regard the P. Respondent is concerned.
b) To set aside and quash impugned Letter No. E/E-22/JE (P.Way)/LDCE/2024 dated 26/28.11.2024 issued by the Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway, Asansol as regard the P. Respondent is concerned.
c) To set aside and quash impugned Letter No. DSC/ 5/Selection/JE (P . Way) / 20% LDCE/24 dated 31.07.2025 issued by the Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway, Asansol.
d) To direct the respondents to review the selection pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
