Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Smt. Sevanti Tukaram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employee's reversion based on not passing a typing test. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. counterarguments regarding test requirements and applicant's performance. (Para 5) |
| 3. tribunal's reasoning on legality and fairness of reversion. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. concluding dismissal of application. (Para 12) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Shri Yogesh Shukla authority holder of Shri K. K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri K. K. Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents, are present and heard.
2. The instant original application has been filed seeking following relief:
“(i) In view of the facts and the grounds mentioned above, applicant prays before this Hon'ble Tribunal to set-aside the impugned order 16.02.2016 (Annexure- to compilation No. 1) passed by Senior Divisional Karmik Adhikari, North Central Railway, Jhansi as well as the order dated 11.03.2016 (Annexure- to compilation No. 1) passed by Divisional Railway Manager, Karmik, North Central Railway Jhansi.
OR
issue any other order or direction which this Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case..
3. The applicant was initially appointed as a Group-D employee under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
