Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, J, Sanjiv Kumar, ACJ
Anjani Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of applicant's challenge to policy changes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. addressing delays and the statute of limitations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents' position on the new policy's implementation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. applicant's claims regarding accrued rights and their implications. (Para 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 5. court's analysis of rules and entitlements. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 6. conclusion on the oa dismissal and reasoning. (Para 15 , 19) |
ORDER(Oral)
PER JUSTICE M.G. SEWLIKAR, MEMBER (J):
With the consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing at the stage of Admission.
The applicant has raised challenge to RBE 37 of 2018 and has sought quashing of the Order dated 07.03.2024 issued by the Deputy CPO (Gaztt) N.F. Railway, Maligaon with a direction to the respondents to grant upgradation as per the old scheme.
2. Shorn of the details, factual matrix is that the applicant was screened on 01st Jan, 2018 under the existing policy RBE 62/2008, which had allowed NFU on completion of 03 years of service in Group – B. Accordingly, the applicant was due for upgradation to Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- (Revised) w.e.f. 13.03.2018. However, RBE No. 37 of 2018 was issued on 08.03.2018 introducing a n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
