Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
VEENA KOTHAVALE, Judicial Member, SISIR KUMAR RATHO, Administrative Member
N.B.Nazeer Basha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's employment history and pay claim (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents deny gp 4600 due to pay rules (Para 4) |
| 3. precedents favor applicant's gp 4600 claim (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. delay and vrs bar relief per precedents (Para 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. 6th cpc and oms exclude gp 4600 for jht (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. courts defer to pay commission; oa dismissed (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Sisir Kumar Ratho, Member(A))
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following reliefs:-
“1) To call for the records on the file Office Order No. PF/185/FN dated 29.06.2018 passed by R2 and his order in letter No. PF/185/FN dated 31.12.2018 of R2 and quash the same as illegal; and
2) To direct the respondents to grant to the applicant the benefit of pay structure in PB 2 (Rs.9300-34,800) + G.P Rs.4600/-w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and the consequential first financial up-gradations under MACP Scheme , in PB 2 (Rs.9300-34,800) + G.P Rs.4800/- w.e.f. 01.01.2008 the second financial up-gradation in PB 3 (Rs. 9300-34,800) + G.P Rs.5400/- w.e.f. 14.09.2015; and/ Or
3) To pass any other order or direction or grant any other relief, in the circumstan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
