Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, Judicial Member, Mohan Pyare, Administrative Member
Niranjan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's employment history and pay revisions in mtnl. (Para 1 , 2 , 7) |
| 2. entitlement to pay protection based on revised lpc. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. notional pay revision does not qualify for refixation. (Para 6) |
| 4. precedents support pay protection irrespective of selection mode. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. notional pay effective prior to resignation qualifies for protection. (Para 12) |
| 6. quash orders and revise pay per latest lpc. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“i) The Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned orders dated 19.3.2019 and 08.04.2019 vide which request of the applicant regarding revision of initial pay on the basis of latest L.P.C. dated 24.01.2019, has been rejected and issue further order and direction to the respondent nos.2 and 3 to revise the initial pay of the applicant on the basis of Latest L.P.C. dated 24.01.2019, with its all consequential benefits, as flown earlier as per earlier L.P.C. with 18% interest on the financial arrears accrued thereafter.
ii) To issue any
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
