SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3902

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Owasis Mehdi Mir – Appellant
Versus
State Of J & K – Respondent
Transfer Application No. 5682/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vikram Rathore
For the Respondents: Sudesh Magotra, Rajesh Thapa

Rule 3 of SRO-349/1998 mandates that sportspersons with higher academic qualifications must be considered for corresponding higher non-gazetted posts; failure to ensure parity with similarly situated candidates in the exercise of this rule constitutes arbitrary discrimination violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) J&K Appointment of Outstanding Sports Persons Rules, 1998 - Rule 3 - Selection and appointment - Claim for appointment to higher non-gazetted post on account of higher educational qualification - Petitioner a Post-Graduate sportsperson recommended by Selection Committee for higher posts but appointed to lower post - Held, rule 3 carries a statutory mandate to consider more qualified candidates for higher posts; arbitrary denial of such consideration is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. (Paras 6, 7, 14, 15).

(B) Administrative Law - Right to equality - Parity - Similarly situated candidates granted higher posts while petitioner denied - State cannot apply different yardsticks - Administrative convenience cannot extinguish legitimate statutory claims. (Paras 13, 16).

Facts of the case:
Applicant, a post-graduate sportsperson, sought appointment to a higher non-gazetted post under SRO-349/1998. Although recommended by the Selection Committee for higher posts, he was appointed to a lower post citing non-availability of vacancies. His representation for a higher post was rejected, leading to the current challenge.

Findings of Court:
Impugned order rejecting the claim is arbitrary and lacks parity. Respondents directed to reconsider the petitioner's case for higher post with notional benefits if found eligible.

Issues: Whether the denial of appointment to a higher non-gazetted post for a qualified sportsperson under SRO-349/1998 constitutes discrimination and whether administrative convenience justifies such denial.

Ratio Decidendi: Statutory rules enabling appointment to higher posts for qualified candidates create an enforceable right; once the selection committee identifies eligibility and qualification, non-appointment based on administrative vacancy claims without regard to parity with similarly situated candidates renders the action discriminatory and arbitrary under Article 14.

Result: Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts and relief sought in the recruitment matter. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondents' arguments on the nature of sports quota concessions versus statutory mandates. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. application of established precedent regarding statutory consideration for higher posts. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. finding of arbitrariness and violation of the principle of equality by ignoring parity. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. final directions to reconsider applicant's claim for higher post appointment. (Para 18 , 19)

ORDER

Per: - Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member

1. The SWP No.2915/2017 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A No.5682/2020 by the Registry of this Tribunal.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: -

a) Writ of mandamus commanding "upon the respondents to appoint the petitioner in true spirit of SRO 349/1998 to a higher grade as had been done in case of other selectees who were similarly situated.

b) Writ of mandamus declaring the SRO 349/1998 as ultra vires to the constitution to the extent section in particular doesn't provide any method er procedure how to exhaust the selected candidates who are equal in terms of section 3 of SRO for providing them sppomitments in different pay scales Pithout following the constitutional mandate.

c) Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned Govt. order no. 953-GAD of 2017 dated 24/07/2017 by which the case of the petitioner was denied to appoint the petitioner in true spirit of BRO 349/1998 to a higher grade us had been done in case of other selectees who was similarly situated and in terms of Hon'ble High Court order in SWP No. 697/2017 titled Owasis Mehdi Mir v/ State and others dated 23/03/2017.

d) Any other relief, order or directions which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.

3. The facts of the case as pleaded by the petitioner in his pleadings are as follows: -

a) The present Transfer Application arises out of SWP No. 2915/2017 which was filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and subsequently transferred to this Tribunal. The applicant, an outstanding sportsperson and a Post-Graduate in Science (Geology), seeks appointment to a higher non-gazetted post under the provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir Appointment of Outstanding Sports Persons Rules, 1998 (SRO-349 of 1998).

b) The case of the applicant is that he represented the Union Territory in various State, National and Inter-Zonal handball competitions and secured notable achievements including winning a gold medal. Being a post-graduate, he claimed eligibility for consideration against a higher non-gazetted post in terms of the proviso to Rule 3 of SRO-349/1998, which provides that candidates possessing graduation or higher qualification may be considered for appointment to higher non-gazetted posts.

c) It is pleaded that a Selection Committee constituted under the said Rules held a meeting on 29.02.2016 wherein the names of eligible sportspersons were considered. The applicant was placed at Serial No. 29 in the list and was recommended for appointment to the posts of Geological Assistant in the Geology and Mining Department or General Line Teacher (Higher Grade) in the School Education Department commensurate with his qualification.

d) Subsequently, the General Administration Department sought identification of vacancies from the concerned departments. While the School Education Department reported availability of a post of General Line Teacher in District Budgam, the Industries and Commerce Department communicated that no vacancy of Geological Assistant was available. Consequently, the applicant was appointed as General Line Teacher (Higher Grade) vide Government Order dated 14.02.2017 in the pay scale of Rs. 5200-20200 with Grade Pay of Rs. 2800.

e) The applicant ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top