Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Judicial Member, Sanjeeva Kumar, Administrative Member
Suraj Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCTD through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of selection, cancellation, and restoration. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. screening committee withdraws appointment due to juvenile fir. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. issue: can juvenile acquittal justify terminating employment? (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. parties argue parity with vikash precedent on juvenile protection. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. juvenile records obliterated; no disqualification for employment. (Para 13) |
| 6. impugned order quashed; applicant reinstated with benefits. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)
In the present O.A., filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):-
“i) To quash and setaside the order dated 17.01.2017 and to further direct the respondents that offer of appointment letter dated 11.07.2012 be restored with all consequential benefits including seniority & promotion and pay & allowances.
ii) To quash and set-aside the minutes of screening Committee meeting in respect of applicant at A-2.
Or/and
iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also awarded to the applicant.”
2. The claim of the applicant has been contested by the res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
