Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Ummed Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. third round litigation over quarter recovery rejection. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. employee's vrs attempt and unauthorized quarter retention. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. challenge to show-cause notice and prior representations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. no physical handover; penal rent justified per rules. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. no estoppel against law; rules not cited by parties. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. prior oa dismissed as infructuous. (Para 13) |
| 7. cannot determine without legal rules cited. (Para 14) |
| 8. quash unreasoned order; remand for reasoned decision. (Para 15) |
| 9. costs imposed; oa disposed with directions. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Lok Ranjan, Member (A)
The present Original Application had been filed against the Speaking Order dated 27.05.2016 – issued by the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Jaipur Division, North Western Railway (NWR), the Respondent No.3 – thereby rejecting the Applicant’s representations dated 18.12.2015 and 17.03.2016 vide which the Applicant had sought forcancellation of theShow- Cause Notice dated 04.12.2015issued for recovery of the arrear and penal rents from the Applicant on account of his unauthorised retention of the Railway QuarterNo.E/21/A at Fatehpur S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
