Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member
Gurbachan Lal – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and pay fixation grievances under sros. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondents' reply denying sro benefits post-retirement. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. applicant's arguments on estoppel and supreme court precedent. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. respondents' contention on correcting erroneous pay fixation. (Para 12) |
| 5. court summarizes facts and frames key issues on sro entitlements. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. high court ruling upholding sro-149 benefits for skilled workers. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. rejection of respondents' defense; natural justice violation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. order quashing impugned order and granting reliefs. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
O R D E R
The present Original Application (in short O.A.) has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following reliefs:-
“i. Seeking quashment of office order No. JSMDNJ/628=30 dated 17.05.2022 passed by respondent No. 3 whereby the claim of the applicant has been rejected the rejection being illegal arbitrary and contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case the order of rejection has been passed by the respondents just to deprive the applicant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
