Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Deepali Purkayastha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' service history and acp claim details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants argue acp entitlement due to pay stagnation. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents defend promotion from ldc disqualifies acp. (Para 4) |
| 4. tribunal frames issue on promotion financial benefit. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. ldc to ja promotion bars first acp; error rectification valid. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
O R D E R
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicants have filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, praying for the following relief(s) highlighting the facts of the case:
“a) Permission may kindly be granted under Rule 4 (5) (a) to the applicants to join together and file a single application since having regard to the cause and the nature of relief prayed for they have a common interest in the matter,
b) The impugned Speaking Order be quashed;
c) The impugned letters/orders being contrary to law and rules be quashed;
d) The respondents be ordered/directed not to give any effect to the impugned letters/orders;
e) The respondents be further order/directed to restore the scale of pay of Rs.5000-8000/- to the applicants as alrea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
