SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4075

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, Judicial Member, Hukum Singh Meena, Administrative Member
Piyush Mangaldas Patel – Appellant
Versus
Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, BSNL – Respondent
OA|OA No. 48/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rutvij Patel
For the Respondents: Mr. Joy Mathew

Disability Act s.20(4) prohibits premature retirement of employee acquiring disability during service; mandates alternative/supernumerary post till superannuation, prevailing over service rules.

Headnote:(A) Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 20(4) - BSNL CDA Rules, 2006 - Rule 55(A)(1)(i) - Compulsory retirement - Employee acquired mental disability during service - Employer aware of disability through medical referrals and performance records noting mental unfitness - Cannot prematurely retire despite poor performance - Statutory protection prevails over service rules - Must shift to alternative post with same pay or supernumerary post till superannuation - Provisions of Disability Act override premature retirement rules in conflict. (Paras 7-15)

(B) Service Law - Premature retirement - Sovereign power under service rules not absolute when employee protected under disability legislation - Employer must consider entire service record but cannot ignore mandatory protections for acquired disabilities - No exemption claimed by employer from Disability Act applicability. (Paras 13-14)

Facts of the case:
Employee joined service as technician, promoted to junior executive, acquired mental illness during service evidenced by medical certificates (40-70% disability, later 60% permanent), employer requested mental check-ups and noted unfitness in records. Review committee prematurely retired employee w.e.f. 17.03.2019 citing performance despite awareness of disability. Representation rejected; prior tribunal directed consideration under old Disability Act. New rejection order upheld retirement in public interest without addressing new Act.

Findings of Court:
Disability acquired during service, known to employer; compulsory retirement orders quashed. Employee notionally reinstated on supernumerary post till superannuation with full consequential benefits including arrears adjusted against received dues.

Issues: Whether service rules permit premature retirement of employee with acquired disability despite statutory protections; precedence of Disability Act over premature retirement rules; obligation to provide alternative/supernumerary employment.

Ratio Decidendi: Disability Act Section 20(4) prohibits dispensing with service of employee acquiring disability during tenure - shift to suitable post or supernumerary till superannuation mandatory; prevails over conflicting service rules; employer awareness via records triggers protection irrespective of performance basis for retirement.

Result: OA partly allowed - impugned orders quashed; notional service till superannuation with benefits within 90 days.

Table of Content
1. applicant's service history and disability certificates (Para 1 , 2)
2. rpwd act 2016 prevails over bsnl rules (Para 3)
3. compulsory retirement valid per bsnl rules (Para 4)
4. rejoinder and precedent on disability protection (Para 5)
5. disability acquired in service protects against retirement (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

O R D E R

Per : Hon’ble Dr.Hukum Singh Meena, Member (A)

1. The applicant has filed the present OA being aggrieved with order dated 20.12.2022 whereby he was compulsory retired from service and vide order dated 16.03.2019 whereby his name was stuck off from the pay roll of BSNL under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal’s Act, 1985 seeking following reliefs:-

“(i) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to admit and allow this application.

(ii) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to declare the impugned order dated 20/12/2022 rejecting the representation dated 22/01/2019 of the applicant as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, irrational, unjustified & in violation of section - 20 of The Disability Act and also in violation of Article 14, 16, 19(1)(g), 21, 39(1) & 350 of the Constitution of India & further be pleased to quash and set aside the same.

(iii) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to declare the impugned notice / order dated 10/12/2018 and an order dated 16/03/019 and all consequential & incidental actions relieving the applicant from the service by way of compulsory retirement as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, irrational, unjustified & in violation of section - 20 of The Disability Act and also in violation of Article 14, 16, 19(1)(g), 21, 39(1) & 350 of the Constitution of India & further be pleased to quash and set aside the same.

(iv) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to pass an order to reinstate the applicant in the service on the post of JTO or any other appropriate post within the purview of Section 20 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 w.e.f. 17/03/2019 & to pay salary regularly till he reaches the superannuation age of 60 years.

(v) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to pass an order directing the respondents to pay the arrears of full back wages, along with interest calculated at the rate of 9% thereon, from 17/03/2019 till the date of reinstatement or till the date of superannuation on reaching the age of 60 years, whichever is earlier; after adjusting amount of pension already paid to the applicant.

(vi) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to pass an order directing the respondents to enroll the applicant to the strength of the appropriate unit of BSNL and allow the applicant to continue his employment.

(vii) If the applicant reaches the age of superannuation pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this application, then the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to pass an order that his pension & all other retirement benefits be ordered to be revised as per "last pay" as on the date of superannuation & difference of retirement benefits & pension be directed to be paid considering this pay with 9% interest till payment.

(viii) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to pass an order granting cost / compensation to the applicant for the mental agony faced, hardship caused expenses incurred for justice by him.

ix) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to pass any other appropriate order deemed fit in the interest of justice.”

2. Brief facts of the case of the applicant are as under:-

2.1 That the applicant had worked with BSNL since 05.04.1985. He joined the BSNL as a Technician and at the time of his compulsory retirement he was working as Junior Telecom Officer (JTO) at Ahmedabad Telecom Circle.

2.2 Further, it was submitted that when the applicant was working as JTO, BNSL at Office of the Sub-Divisional Engineer Duct Maintenance, Naranpura Telephone Exchange, the Sub Divisional Engineer (Duct Maintenance) vide communi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top