Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Judicial Member, Mallika Arya, Administrative Member
Gopal Krishna Jemini – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. connected oas heard together due to identical issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants claim regularization based on long service and precedents. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents oppose citing irregular appointment and uma devi. (Para 4) |
| 4. long continuous service on essential duties warrants regularization despite uma devi. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. applicants' decade-long service entitles regularization consideration. (Para 9) |
| 6. direct respondents to regularize suitable applicants within three months. (Para 10 , 11) |
O R D E R
Delivered by Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM.-
As the subject matter in all the connected O.As are one and the same and the relief/s sought by the applicants are similar, merely having different dates would not in any way disturb the ultimate finding to be given by this Tribunal. Therefore, as requested by the counsel for either sides, all the O.As have been heard together and decided by a common order.
2. In the present original application, the applicants, who were initially engaged between 1995 – 2005 as daily wager to work on different posts in the office of CIT, Gwalior, are seeking direction to the respondents to regularize their services.
3. Learned counsel for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
