Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Kalipada Singha Roy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. high court remands case for fresh hearing after quashing prior tribunal order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's long service as casual labour since 1985, granted temporary status. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. parties dispute eligibility under csir scheme 1995 and dopt oms. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. applicant's continuous service on perennial duties despite qualification gaps. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 5. supreme court rulings limit uma devi; mandate regularization for irregular long-term employees. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. direct regularization from 2009 with consequential benefits. (Para 18 , 19) |
O R D E R
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. This O.A was disposed of on 25.04.2025 by this Tribunal allowing the prayer of the applicant. The respondents filed an appeal against our order dated 25.04.2025 in the Hon’ble High Court by filing WPCT No. 240 of 2025 which quashed and set aside our order remanding the matter back to the Tribunal on the ground that adequate time and opportunity was not granted to the respondents to engage a new counsel after their earlier counsel returned the brief. Hon’ble High Court disposed of the WPCT by passing following observatio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
