SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4131

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member, Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member
Mool Chand Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 217/2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arihant Samdaria
For the Respondents: Rajendra Vaish, V.D. Sharma

Retirement benefits and pension are calculated based on the 'last pay drawn' in the substantive cadre post, not on the enhanced salary drawn during an ex-cadre tenure or special assignment.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Land Revenue (Qualifications and Conditions of Service of Chairman and Members of the Board) Rules, 1971 - Rule 13(1-A) - IAS (Pay) Rules, 2007 - Pay fixation for tenure postings versus substantive posts - Applicant claimed pension and retiral benefits based on last salary drawn during an ex-cadre tenure assignment as Member, Board of Revenue, rather than his substantive cadre post. Court held that salary attached to an ex-cadre tenure post cannot be considered as 'last pay drawn' for the purpose of computing retirement benefits on his substantive position. (Paras 10, 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, while a Rajasthan Administrative Service officer, was appointed on tenure as a Member, Board of Revenue. During this tenure, he was promoted to the Indian Administrative Service. Upon retirement, he sought to have his pension and retirement benefits calculated based on the higher salary he received during his tenure as Member, Board of Revenue, claiming his pay fixation upon IAS promotion should have been derived from that higher tenure pay.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal emphasized that a tenure posting does not represent a promotional hierarchy but is an ex-cadre assignment where the official retains a lien on their substantive post. Pension and retiral benefits are strictly calculated based on the salary of the substantive post, not the enhanced emoluments of a tenure assignment. The application was found to be without merit.

Issues: Whether an officer is entitled to have pension and retirement benefits fixed on the basis of salary drawn during an ex-cadre tenure posting rather than their substantive cadre post.

Ratio Decidendi: A government servant holds a lien on their substantive post while on a tenure/special appointment. Benefits are fixed based on the substantive post's salary, and tenure-based emoluments are distinct and do not establish the basis for terminal benefit calculations post-retirement.

Result: Original Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts regarding the applicant's service history and prayer for re-fixation of pay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. parties' contentions regarding pay fixation rules and relevant service conditions. (Para 4 , 5)
3. distinction between substantive post salary and tenure assignment emoluments for retirement benefits. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

ORDER

Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant praying for the following reliefs: -

(i) To issue an appropriate order/direction for quashing/setting aside / modifying the Revised Last Pay Certificate dated 16-10-2014 (Annexure A/1), Pay Fixation order dated 07-08-2014 (Annexure A2), Pension Payment Order dated 10-11-2014 (Annexure A/3), Gratuity Payment Order dated 03-11-2014 (Annexure A/4) and Leave Encashment Order dated 11-08-2014 (Annexure A/5) and in sequel thereof

(ii) Issue an appropriate order/direction to the Respondents for re-fixation of the applicant's pay in IAS cadre over and above Rs. 56,350/- by way of grant of additional increment because pre-promotion pay of the applicant was Rs. 56,350/- and promotion to I.A.S. on 31.12.2012 makes him entitled to get one higher increment, with the addition of two annual increments in which fell due on 01-07-2013 and 01-07-2014 and thereafter to arrive at the last pay of the applicant at Rs. 61,570/- on the date of his retirement on 31-07-2014 and direct for payment of entire arrears on grant of higher increments and after grant of annual increments and consequently the arrears of retirements benefits with interest @ 18% p.a.

(iii) To further direct the Respondents for revision of commutation of pension, sanction of pension, gratuity, leave encashment and all other retirement benefits on the basis of pay of Rs. 61,570/- to be fixed as stated above and payment of arrears thereof with interest @ 18% p.a.

(iv) To declare the recovery of Rs. 2,36,689/- from gratuity as grossly illegal and invalid and direct its refund with interest @ 18% p.a.

(v) Any other order/direction which this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the applicant.

(vi) To award the cost of the application.

2. The brief facts of the case, as stated by the applicant, are that the applicant, while working in Super Time Scale of Rajasthan Administrative Service (RAS) on ad hoc basis, was appointed as Member, Board of Revenue vide order dated 09.08.2011 (Annexure A/7) on the basis of selection made by the competent authority under the Chairmanship of the Chief Secretary as provided in Rule 5-B of the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Qualifications and Conditions of Service of Chairman and Members of the Board) Rules, 1971. The applicant having been appointed and joined as Member, Board of Revenue, his pay fixation was done by the Board of Revenue (i.e. Respondent No. 3) vide letter dated 29.09.2011 (Annexure A/10) in terms of the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Qualifications and Conditions of Service of Chairman and Members of the Board) Rules, 1971 amended from time to time, and consequently applicant was fixed in the Pay Band of Rs. 37400-67000 at Rs. 54,700/- (Running Pay Band - Rs. 44,700 + Grade Pay of Rs. 10,000/-). Aforesaid pay fixation of the applicant had been made in conformity with Rules because applicant had been appointed as Member, Board of Revenue and he was entitled to get his pay fixed in terms of the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Qualifications and Conditions of Service of Chairman and Members of the Board) Rules, 1971. After aforesaid fixation of pay of the applicant as Member, Board of Revenue, he was sanctioned annual increment on 01.07.2012 and as a consequence thereof, pay of the applicant stood revised to Rs. 56350/-. In the meantime, the applicant stood promoted in the cadre of Indian Administrative Service (IAS) vide order dated 31.12.2012 (Annexure A/11). While the applicant was working as Member of the Boa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top