Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. Haripal, Judicial Member, Braj Mohan Agrawal, Administrative Member
Prabhakaran N.N. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history as commission bearer to absorption. (Para 1 , 10) |
| 2. respondents deny pre-absorption service for pension. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. review of prior tribunal orders and contentions. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. rule 24 applies; munshi ram prevails for 50% reckoning. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. grant 50% service with limited arrears due to delay. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Justice K.Haripal, Judicial Member
Applicant was a Helper retired from the Trivandrum Division of Southern Railway. He had started service as a Commission Bearer on 03.10.1977 after making a security deposit of Rs.150/-. Later, he was made a Salaried Commission Bearer on 27.03.1989 and was absorbed in service on 29.07.1989. He retired from service on 31.05.2013 as Helper Grade-I. He claims parity with the applicant in O.A.440/2003, order of the Tribunal dated 24.02.2006 was confirmed by the Hon’ble High Court in WP(C) 15756/2006, Annexure-A14, and submits that he is entitled to reckon 50% of the period of service between 03.10.1977 and 28.07.1989, for grant of pension and other terminal benefits. Even though he had made representation, that has not been considered and thus appro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
