Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. Sujatha, J, Sanjiv Kumar, A
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chairman cum CEO, Railway board, Ministry of Railways – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and promotion grievances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. applicant's claims of delayed promotions and acr violations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents' defense: delay, laches, and performance-based non-promotion. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. undisputed facts and rejection of past service seniority. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. no right to retrospective promotion; delay bars claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. unchallenged non-selection and estoppel by acceptance. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. time-barred challenge to adverse acr remarks. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. penalty, transfer, and no parity with batchmates upheld. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 9. delay and laches preclude stale promotion claims. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 10. oa barred by limitation; unsettles settled seniority. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 11. oa dismissed for lack of merit and delay. (Para 25 , 26) |
ORDER
Per: Justice S.Sujatha ...........Member(J)
The applicant has filed this original application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
(I) Applicant humbly pray to this Hon’ble court for granting relief to restore damages of due timely promotions salary since January, 1990, along with past service seniority from 01.01.81 up
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
