Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anjani Nandan Sharan, Administrative Member
Amit Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of employment and accommodation allotments (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 9 , 11) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on valid allotment and natural justice (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. respondents' defense of concealment and rule violation (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's reasoning on rules interpretation and natural justice (Para 8 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. relevant rules and impugned orders quoted (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. quashing orders and refund directive (Para 23 , 24) |
O R D E R
Heard Shri Akhilesh Kumar Pandey along with Shri Jitendra Nayak, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Krishna Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following main relief(s):-
(i) Issue an order or directions quashing the orders impugned dated
21.07.2022 and 24.12.2021 (Annexure A-1 & A-2 to the OA)
passed by the Respondent No.5 and 4, respectively.
(ii) Issue an order or directions, commanding the respondents to refund the amount so recovered from his salary in reference to the orders impugned dated 24.12.2021 and 21.07.2022 along with interest.
(iii) Issue a further or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
