Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member
Sarita – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. multiple oas consolidated for common issues. (Para 1) |
| 2. 2014 postal recruitment process and applicant selection. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. cancellation, supreme court reinstatement after scrutiny. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. post-reinstatement cfsl signature mismatch discovery. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. applicants argue new charges exceed sc liberty scope. (Para 15) |
| 6. precedent judgments quashing similar cfsl-based charges. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. handwriting expert opinion weak without corroboration. (Para 19 , 20) |
Per: SH. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR MEMBER (J):
1. All the above Original Applications are taken up together for disposal, as a common question of law and facts are involved in all these cases. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the facts are being extracted from O.A.No.060/105/2021 (Sarita Vs. D/o Posts) and the said case has been treated as a lead case.
2. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking setting aside the impugned memorandum dated 28.05.2019 (Annexure A-8) passed by the disciplinary authority under Rule 14 of the CCS (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 whereby, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
