Mohammad Kazim vs Union Territory of Kargil through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Kargil

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4215

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.S. Latif, Member (Judl.), Prasant Kumar, Member (Admn.)
Mohammad Kazim – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Kargil through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Kargil – Respondent

Advocates:
For the applicant: Mr. M.M. Dar, Sr. Adv.
For the respondents: Mr. Rais-ud-Din Ganaie, Dy. A.G., Mr. Shah Aamir, Mr. Mahapara Ali

Table of Content
1. applicant's reliefs and factual timeline of promotion claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. impugned order discriminatory and contrary to prior regularizations. (Para 4)
3. respondents defend delay due to absent revised recruitment rules. (Para 5)
4. psc's limited role; proposal rejected for rule discrepancies. (Para 6)
5. existing 1969 rules apply; denial violates articles 14 & 16. (Para 8 , 9)
6. quash order; direct regularization with benefits. (Para 10 , 11)

O R D E R

Per Hon’ble Mr. M.S. Latif, Member (Judl.)

Through the medium of the instant OA, applicant seeks following reliefs:-

“(a) By an appropriate order or direction, whereby the impugned order No.33-L&E of 2023 dated 20.06.2023 issued by the respondent No.1 be quashed and declared null and void;

(b) By an appropriate order or direction, whereby respondents more particularly respondent No.2 and 3 be restrained from giving effect to the impugned order for not accorded further consideration to his case;

(c) By an appropriate order or direction, whereby the respondents be directed to consider and pass formal regularization/confirmation order of promotion of the applicant to the post of Assistant Director Employment retrospect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4215

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALM.S. Latif, Member (Judl.), Prasant Kumar, Member (Admn.)Mohammad Kazim – AppellantVersusUnion Territory of Kargil through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Kargil – Respondent

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.S. Latif, Member (Judl.), Prasant Kumar, Member (Admn.)
Mohammad Kazim – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Kargil through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Kargil – Respondent