Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Member (J), B. Anand, Member (A)
Nadir Islam – Appellant
Versus
Employees' State Insurance Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. undisputed facts of initial suspensions and transfers (Para 1 , 2 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. parties' contentions on 90-day suspension review (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. framing issues and prior precedent on timely extension (Para 9) |
| 4. suspension invalid if not extended within 90 days (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. quash orders, reinstate with consequential benefits (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
1. The captioned O.As. are Part Heard.
2. On the last date of hearing, further hearing was deferred at the request of the learned counsel for the respondents in order to enable him to submit the relevant judgment/judgments in support of his contention that if the initial suspension has been reviewed by the relevant committee within 90 days from the initial date of suspension of the applicant, even if the order of continuation of such suspension is passed on any date beyond the 90 days, such order of continuation of suspension will not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.
3. Today, learned counsel for the respondents has very fairly submitted: (i) A coordinate Bench of this Tribunal consisting one of us (Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)) has in the case
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
