Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Judicial Member, B. Anand, Administrative Member
Ram Kishore Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Police Through Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of departmental inquiry post-criminal acquittal. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties' contentions on rule 12 exceptions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. trial court acquittal due to prosecution failures. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. rule 12 exceptions not applicable; honorable acquittal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. oa allowed; orders set aside with benefits. (Para 14) |
O R D E R (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)
1.The instant Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 by the applicant seeking following relief(s):-
“1. To quash and set aside the Order initiating DE dt.18.1.2009, Summary of Allegations dt.15.6.2010, Findings dt.9.4.2012, Order of Punishment dt.17.8.2012 and Order dt.3.6.2025
2. To direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in service w.e.f.17.8.2012 with all consequential benefits including promotion/seniority, arrears of pay and all the Pension-cum-retirement benefits w.e.f.1.1.2025 with 18% compound interest w.e.f.1.1.2025.
2. To award cost in favor of the applicant and pass any order or orders, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem just & equitable in the facts & circumstances of the case.”
2. The claim of the applicant h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
