Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. Sujatha, Judicial Member, Sanjiv Kumar, Administrative Member
B. Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. advance increments treated as pay for all purposes per dopt oms. (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's service history and pay fixation events. (Para 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court interprets oms: increments count for all purposes including drawal. (Para 8 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. respondents' contention: increments separate from basic pay. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. quash revisions, refund recovery, no recovery from group c. (Para 22) |
O R D E R (ORAL)
PER: DR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
The Original Application is filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following reliefs:
“(a) Call for records of the case from the respondents and on perusal
(b) This Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned Letters No. Pay Tech/Pay Fix/2876/2022 dated 14.12.2022 (Annexure A7) and No.Pay Tech/CPGRAM Con/2023 dated 22.9.2023 (Annexure A11) both passed by third respondent as also D.O. Part II order Ser No.Civ/D4/2023 dated 12.1.2023 (Annexure A8) passed by second respondent
(c) Declare that the applicant is entitled to annual increments on the advance increments granted to him till he gets promotion/ACP/MACP and direct the respondents No.2 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
