Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Umesh Gajankush, Member (J), Sangam Narain Srivastava, Member (A)
Rajashree B. Karlekar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's military service history and railway joining (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. nps applies post-2004; rule 34 inapplicable to non-pensionable service (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. count non-pensionable military service under rule 34 (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. oa barred by delay and laches (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. no continuing wrong; oa dismissed due to delay and nps applicability (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
Per : Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
1.The present O.A. has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for seeking the following reliefs:-
“a. That this Hon’ble Tribunal be graciously pleased to quash the order dated 18.04.2018 (Annexure A-1) passed by the respondent No.2 vide which the respondents have rejected the claim of the applicant on the ground of earlier military service was not pensionable.
b. | That this Hon’ble Tribunal be graciously pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant and her service to be governed by provisions of old pension scheme i.e. Railway Service (Pension) Rules 1993 and accordingly all the benefits as per old pension scheme may be given to her.
Cc. That this Hon’ble Tribunal be graciously pleased to direct
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
