Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pay anomaly due to acp options and juniors' higher pay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. senior's right to pay parity with juniors. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. no stepping up if disparity from option exercise. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. dop&t guidelines on stepping up pay. (Para 14) |
| 5. analysis of pay fixation anomaly. (Para 15) |
| 6. anomaly from fr 22(i)(a)(1) requires correction. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. guidelines mandate stepping up for qualifying anomalies. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. senior entitled to pay stepping up. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. quash orders; direct pay stepping up. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
O R D E R
By Hon’ble Mr. Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J) :-
1.The applicant has filed this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief(s) :-
―8.1 Quash and set aside the impugned communications at Annexure A-1 (Colly.) and direct the respondents to correctly fix the pay of the Applicant by stepping up of his pay at par with his juniors by fixing his Basic Pay at Rs.47,600/- along with consequential benefits including arrears of pay and other benefits; and
8.2 An
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
