Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, Administrative Member
Subhas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks quashing of termination and regularization. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's claims of long service and ignored regularization schemes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents deny engagement due to recruitment ban and lack of records. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. applicant cites judgments favoring long-term casual workers' regularization. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court finds no proof of valid engagement or termination. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. original application dismissed for lack of evidence. (Para 14) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
1.Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“(i) The Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the respondent no.6 and oral termination order dated 20.09.2013 passed by respondent No.5 which is stated to have been passed on the direction of the higher authority, with all consequential benefits.
(ii) The Hon’ble Tribunal may further be pleased to pass appropriate order or direction as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit & proper in the interest of justice.
(iii) To award the cost of Original Application
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
