SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4527

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member, Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member
Surinder Kumar Trisal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
Transfer Application No. 5034/2020|TA 3176/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sudershan Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, ld. A.A.G.

Administrative delay cannot defeat retired officers' matured Selection Grade claims based on departmental vacancy recommendations.

Headnote:The judgment addresses claims by retired Deputy Conservators of Forests for Selection Grade based on seniority and vacancies worked out by the department in 2008. Relevant rules govern Selection Grade as 20% of duty posts. Court found departmental delay and arbitrary rejection of claims despite prior High Court directions quashing cryptic orders. Issues framed around entitlement to Selection Grade post-retirement, validity of vacancy calculations, and non-discrimination against retirees. Ratio emphasizes that official vacancy working and recommendations create enforceable rights; administrative delays cannot defeat matured claims; equity requires consistent treatment of similarly placed retirees. Impugned rejection orders quashed; Selection Grade conferred from departmental recommendation date with consequential monetary, pensionary benefits within three months.

Table of Content
1. transfer of writs and reliefs sought for selection grade. (Para 1 , 2)
2. facts of retirement and departmental vacancy working. (Para 3 , 7)
3. parties' contentions on vacancies and eligibility. (Para 4 , 8 , 9)
4. arbitrary denial via delay; rights from recommendations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. quash orders; grant selection grade with benefits. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU (RESERVED)

Hearing through video conferencing Transfer Application No. 5034/2020 & TA 3176/2020 Reserved on: - 19.09.2025 Pronounced on: - 07.04.2026 HON’BLE MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. RAM MOHAN JOHRI, MEMBER (A)

1. TA/5034/2020

1. Surinder Kumar Trisal, S/o Sh. O. N. Trisal Deputy Conservator of Forests (Retired), R/o 204-Anand Bhawan, Sector-14, Nanak Nagar, Jammu. age 69 yrs;

…Applicant (Advocate: - Mr. Sudershan Sharma)

Versus

1. State of Jammu and Kashmir, through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. of J&K, GAD Department, Jammu.

2. Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. of J&K, Forest Department, Jammu.’

3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, J&K State, Jammu.

…Respondents (Advocate:- Mr. Sudesh Magotra, ld. A.A.G.)

2. TA/3176/2020

1. Brij Raj Singh, S/o Late Sh. Karpal Singh Bhadwal, R/o 585-A, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu, Age 68 Years.

…Applicant (Advocate: - Mr. Sudershan Sharma)

Versus

1. State of Jammu and Kashmir, through Commissioner/Secretarу to Govt. of J&K, GAD Department, Jammu.

2. Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. of J&K, Forest Department, Jammu.

3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, J&K State, Jammu.

…Respondents (Advocate:- Mr. Sudesh Magotra, ld. A.A.G.)

ORDER Per: - Ram Mohan Johri, Administrative Member

1. The SWP No.1028/2018 & 1101/2018 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A No.5034/2020 & 3176/2020 respectively by the Registry of this Tribunal.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court seeking following relief: - 1. TA/5034/2020 A) It is most humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may very kindly issue an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing the Govt. Order No. 104-FST of 2017 dated 27/4/2017 vide which the respondents illegally, malafidely and arbitrarily rejected the case of the petitioner for grant of Selection Grade.

B) A Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to accord and confer Selection Grade to the petitioner from the date he became/becomes entitled to that, with all consequential benefits, including the monetary benefits.

2. TA/3176/2020 A) It is most humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may very kindly issue an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing the Govt. Order No. 34-FST of 2017 dated 6/3/2017 vide which the respondents illegally, malafidely and arbitrarily rejected the case of the petitioner for grant of Selection Grade.

B) A Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to accord and confer Selection Grade to the petitioner from the date he became/becomes entitled to that, with all consequential benefits, including the monetary benefits.

3. The facts of the case as pleaded by the petitioners in their pleadings are as follows: -

a) These two Transfer Applications arise out of writ petitions earlier filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, which were subsequently transferred to this Tribunal. Both applicants were officers of the Forest Department who retired from the post of Deputy Conservator of Forests (DCF) and claim entitlement to conferment of Selection Grade on the basis of seniority and availability of vacancies.

TA No. 5034/2020 (Surinder Kumar Trisal)

b) The applicant initially entered the cadre of Deputy Conservator of Forests on adhoc basis and was subsequently regularised in the said cadre pursuant to Government Order dated 14.11.2007 with notional effect from 01.01.2002 and regular effect from 08.01.2003. He continued to serve in the department till his retirement on 31.05.2007.

c) According to the applicant, vacancies

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top