Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K.HARIPAL, Judicial Member, V.RAMA MATHEW, Administrative Member
Shahul Hameed.A. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to transfer order during disciplinary issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on lack of competence and tenure violation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents justify transfer on administrative grounds. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court upholds drm competence and transfer validity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. transfer as service incident; oa dismissed. (Para 18) |
O R D E R
HON'BLE Ms.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
The applicant working as an Assistant Loco Pilot at Mangalore Junction under the Palakkad Division of Southern Railway, is aggrieved by the order of transfer dated 26.06.2024 issued by the 5th respondent transferring him to Chennai Division. The said transfer order is produced as Annexure A-1. He has also challenged the relieving order of the same date, produced as Annexure A-2, pursuant to which he was directed to report before the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Palakkad Division, who in turn issued the consequential relieving order dated 26.06.2024, a copy of which is produced as Annexure A-3. He submits that Annexure A-1 transfer order is without jurisdiction, contrary to statutory provisions and liable to be set aside.
2. Briefly t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
