Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Member (J), Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
Raj Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. history of prior litigation and partial implementation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's misconduct justifies grading (Para 3) |
| 3. review dpc's independent acr assessment valid (Para 4) |
| 4. no violation in review dpc reassessment (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. oa dismissed, no interference warranted (Para 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
By Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
1.The present O.A. has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief(s):-
“(a) It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to order Directly for Promotion of the Applicant to the post of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax for the vacancy year 2001-02 with all the consequential promotions on the further higher posts notionally w.e.f. 07.11.2001 alongwith entire monetary benefits till the date of Retirement i.e. upto 31.03.2012 as arrears of the pay and allowances and further more, the monetary benefits in Pension's arrears and increments etc. as per laws and rules. This relief is sought in the light of the law contained in the statutory Rule 18.3, a sub rule of the statutory Rule 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
