Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anand S. Khati, Member
Nitesh Kohar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer order issued but held in abeyance due to absence. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's claims of humanitarian transfer and family hardship. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. respondents justify cancellation citing unauthorized absence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. transfer is incident of service, no vested right. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. cancellation valid due to misconduct and unsubstantiated claims. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. oa dismissed; no enforceable right or relief. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
O R D E R
By virtue of the present Original Application (OA), the applicant is seeking implementation of the transfer order dated 14.05.2025, whereby he has been transferred from Chennai to Delhi. He has sought for the following reliefs in the OA:-
“(i) To quash and set aside the impugned order No. 163/2025 dated 27.05.2025 (A-1) and order F.No. Est-19/1/2024- EST-HO dated 25.07.2025 (A-1A) and direct the respondents to implement the transfer order dated 14.05.2025/transfer the applicant to Delhi.
(ii) To declare the action of respondents in not implementing the transfer order of applicant dated 14.05.2025 as illegal and direct the respondent to relieve the applicant as per transfer order date
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
