Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member, Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
Bodh Raj – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants engaged as daily wagers seek regularization under sro 64. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents deny regularization claiming casual labour status. (Para 5 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. applicants argue discrimination and minor breaks irrelevant. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court identifies key issues on status and service continuity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. long service converts casual to daily rated workers. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. nominal breaks do not defeat regularization rights. (Para 24) |
| 7. uma devi permits regularization of irregular long-term service. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 8. repeal does not extinguish accrued regularization rights. (Para 27) |
| 9. discrimination against equals violates articles 14, 16. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 10. impugned order quashed; regularization and benefits directed. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
O R D E R
1.Per:- Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member The applicants have filed the instant Original Application (in short O.A.) seeking the following reliefs:-
“a) Quashing the Government Order bearing No. 86 JK (FST) of 2024 dated 10-4-2024, issued by respondent No. 3, whereby, the claim of the applicants 1 to 6, husband of applicant No. 7 namely Late Sh. Ash
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
