Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member, Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
Kamal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' long continuous daily wager service established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 13 , 14 , 24) |
| 2. applicants claim regularization under sro 64; respondents cite uma devi. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. applicants eligible post-1994 cut-off extension to 2001. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. high court precedents affirm post-1994 regularization entitlement. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. uma devi inapplicable; distinguishes irregular statutory engagements. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 6. repeal does not affect accrued seven-year regularization rights. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. discriminatory to deny similarly situated employees regularization. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. direct regularization after seven years continuous service ordered. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
O R D E R
Per:- Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member
The brief facts of the case, as stated, in the Original Application (in short O.A.) are that applicants were engaged as Daily Wagers in the PHE City Division No. II on different dates commencing from June 1996 to February 2000 and subsequently, they were transferred to PHE City Division No. I. It is averred that the applicants, since the date of their engagement, have been performing their duties continu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
