Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Narendra Kumar Johari, Judicial Member
Chitra Ketu Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to reduced basic pay and gratuity (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. justification for pay correction and recovery (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. applicability of pension verification rules (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. factual background of pay fixation and payments (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. limitations on emoluments verification under rule 59 (Para 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 6. rules on recovery of government dues from gratuity (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. no bar to clerical mistake correction post-retirement (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
O R D E R
JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER (J) :-
1.Learned counsel for applicant, on the basis of his case submitted that applicant was under employment of B.S.N.L. and retired on 31.07.2016, while serving as Divisional Engineer (Optical Fiber Cable), Eastern Telecom Region, B.S.N.L. Gaya. At the time of his retirement, his last basic pay was Rs.53,290/- as mentioned in his Last Pay Certificate dated 25.03.2017. But after his superannuation, the Opposite parties have calculated last basic pay of the applicant as Rs. 49,620/- which is absolutely wrong and without any basis. Before reducing the basic pay, the Opposite Parties have neither issued any adverse order not any show cause
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
