Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Meherunechha Bibi – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. history of compassionate appointment claim post-employee death in 1999. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on scheme applicability and family indigence assessment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. case law on death-date scheme applicability. (Para 7) |
| 4. prior order set aside; no true compliance with 1998 scheme. (Para 8 , 9) |
Per: Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
1. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief:
“a. Leave may kindly be granted to file and hear this original application jointly before the Hon'ble Tribunal as per RULE 4(5) of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules. Both the applicants have the common object for obtaining direction from the Hon'ble Tribunal for the appointment of the applicant No.2, the dependent son of the deceased employee in the postal or in any other departments under Union of India as there is no other efficacious way to file the application.
b. An order do issue upon the respondents to issue necessary order for the appointment of the applicant on the compassionate ground at the death of the deceased employee by setting aside
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
