Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Member (J), Pramod Kumar Das, Member (A)
Sankarsan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of disciplinary proceedings, charges, and career progression. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. applicant's confessions and evidence proving forgery. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. no change in disciplinary authority via financial upgradations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. limited judicial review in disciplinary matters. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. dismissal upheld due to admissions and no procedural violation. (Para 18 , 19) |
O R D E R
SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J):
1.Challenging the Chargesheet Dated 04.08.2015 (A/3) issued by Respondent No.4 beyond competency, illegal & arbitrary, punishment order passed thereon vide Memo dated 14.12.2018(A/21), and speaking order of DPS (HQ) BBSR dated 30.09.2019 (A/27) by denying the reasonable opportunity to cross examine the state witness effectively which is absolutely illegal and arbitrary action of the Respondents and also not sustainable in the eye of law and rules, in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in the case of {Chittaranjan Choudhury v. State of Bihar, (1987) 2 SCC 104}. Hence the instant O.A. has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with the following prayer(s):-
“
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
