Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Krishna, Member (A)
Parag Kolba Shahakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's reasons for 7-year delay in filing oa. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' arguments on condonation and limitation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. background of compassionate appointment rejection. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. s.21 mandates sufficient cause for delay condonation. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
1.The applicant has filed MA No.1461/2023 in OA No.1154/2023 for condonation of delay of 3 and % years as impugned order under challenge was passed on 26.08.2016.
2. It has been submitted in the application for condonation of delay that the applicant, being a layman, was not aware of the steps to be taken for challenging the impugned order, thereby, there being no proper advise received within time for filing the OA, that after passing of the impugned order i.e. on 26.08.2016, the applicant was not having knowledge to challenge the said order. However, in the month of October, 2018, he met his friend, who is practicing Advocate and narrated the above fact to him. The friend of the Advocate advised him to challenge the present order before the Hon’ble High Court. Accordingly, the friend of applicant drafted Writ Petition in the month of January, 2019 and when he visited the office of the Hon’b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
