CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member, Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Administrative Member
G. Sreekanth – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's prayer for ips promotion with notional seniority. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. state's opposition on actual service requirement. (Para 3) |
| 3. applicant's contentions on delay due to state fault. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. precedents supporting notional service for promotions. (Para 16) |
| 5. notional appointment warrants earlier ips allotment. (Para 17) |
| 6. quash rejection, direct reconsideration with relaxation. (Para 18) |
(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)
By this Original Application, the applicant is seeking the following relief:
“This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to declare the action
said promotion from the feeder category i.e. Dy. S.P. w.e.f. 01.06.2001as arbitrary, capricious, illegal and unconstitutional and as a consequence thereof direct the respondents to consider the request of the applicant by invoking Rule 3 of AIS (Conditions of Service - Residuary matters) Rules, 1960 to relax rule 5(2) of IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.