Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, Judicial Member, Shri Krishna, Administrative Member
Akhilesh Prasad Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of corruption allegations and proceedings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' contentions on reasoned dismissal order (Para 3) |
| 3. non-compliance with rule 15(2) inquiry procedure (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. improper invocation of rule 19(ii) post-inquiry (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. reasons essential for natural justice (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. remand for reasoned order; pensionary benefits (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORAL ORDER
Per: Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
1.Both these OAs are being disposed of by a common order as the question involved in both these OAs is identical.
2. In OA No. 434/2022, the applicant was working as Accountant cum Typist (ACT) in Nehru Yuva Kendra, Gadchiroli.
2.1. An FIR was lodged by one Archana L. Chudhary, Secretary, Navdrushti Yuvti Mandal, alleging corruption against the applicant. Allegations against the applicant in OA No. 435/2022 were also made regarding corruption.
2.3. Accordingly, on 05th April, 2019, applicants in both the OAs were placed under suspension. Before placing them under suspension, the applicants were arrested and detained by CBI for 48 hours.
2.4. Memorandum of charge was served on 20th June, 2019 and in another OA i.e. i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
