Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Yogesh Kumar Mewara – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of signal overshoot incident and disciplinary proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's challenge to disciplinary authority competence and penalty validity. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents' defense of inquiry procedure and penalty imposition. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. limited judicial review scope in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. no interference with authority competence or inquiry findings. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. compounded penalty under rule-6 rs(d&a) rules unsustainable. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. dies-non treatment for pre-reinstatement period upheld. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. appellate order quashed limitedly; fresh penalty ordered. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
Per : Hon’ble Shri Lok Ranjan, Member (A)
1.This Original Application is made by the Applicantagainst the impugned appellate order dated 06.06.2013 issued by the Respondent No.3, i.e. the Appellate Authority (A.A.),vide which the punishment of compulsory retirement awarded to the Applicantpreviously vide the impugned Notice for Imposition of Penalty (N.I.P.) dated 05.10.2012 of the Respondent No.4, i.e. the Disciplinary Authority (D.A.) had been modified – from compulsory retirement to reversion from the post o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
